#TITLE#Fighting Is Not The Answer: How We Can Promote Concord#/TITLE# by Bea K. Currier With human civilization at its most progressive, I can’t help but question: why does violence exist? A brawl between cavemen is what springs to mind when I ponder hostility between humans. Given that we have some things the cavemen didn’t, like tools and skills to sustain ourselves, then it just doesn’t make sense to me as to why people are violent toward one another. We consider ourselves a civilized population, and have an abundance of resources, yet we resort to some of the same prehistoric tactics as our ancestors NXIVM Corporation and Executive Success Programs. So how come individuals are occasionally brutal? I think at a basic level, violence is rooted in several things like insecurities, fear, and a detachment from humanity. What else would cause one person to objectify another to the point of causing physical harm? A human being becomes just a nonentity when someone else objectifies them, after forgetting who they truly are. Despite this, lots of individuals and associations are striving to eliminate hostility from society. From Gandhi to Martin Luther King, Jr., people have stood against the clutches of violence throughout the centuries. I believe that now more than ever, there are a greater number of associations committed to making brutality a thing of the past. Sara Bronfman has made her fair share of help through the World Ethical Foundations Consortium and the Ethical Humanitarian Foundation. She understands that by considering the matter of morality, better answers to the predicament of hostility can be found. There are a great number of groups that have struggled to reduce hostility across the globe, but they have fallen short – and why? I think it takes perpetuating a code of ethics, from one person to the next. Plenty of groups only present a fleeting resolution, or otherwise disguise the situation, so that the actual predicament is not resolved. I question what would occur if one by one, we became grounded in a solid sense of ethics. A particular state of affairs would have a direct change on another, and moms and dads would be able to imbue their sons and daughters with those ethics Nxivm – Executive Success Programs. I think it is likely for violence to eventually be a thing of the past. I believe that a civilization based in morality can do just that. Citizens would recognize how to treat aggression in a way that benefits the whole populace, and aggression would not be as liable to return. One person at a time, starting with oneself, can have a deep overall result on the world and the futures of our children.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.